Even with the smash hit that was JJ Abrams’ 2009 Star Trek reboot and a sequel on the horizon, fans continue to clamor for Star Trek to return in its original form — on the small screen. In recent months reports and rumors have circulated with news of Jonathan Frakes, William Shatner and even director Bryan Singer pitching a new Star Trek television series. While most of these rumors have been shot down and regarded is little more than a pipe dream, none have been as fully developed as the latest addition by David Foster.
Foster, who recently spoke with Deep Space Nine writer Jack Treviño for TrekWeb, said his concept for a new show has been in development for years.
“I have to be very careful with the information that is released on this proposed Star Trek series, as we are still working with several people that can hopefully make this happen.” said Foster, on the topic of the new series.
Last May, we reported on an interview in which Jonathan Frakes mentioned he had been involved with a new Star Trek TV project. Since then, it’s come to light that while Frakes did not pitch the show to Paramount, he was however attached to it for a time.
“The original interview with Frakes was somewhat inaccurate. In it, he had actually said “I had a Star Trek project that was developed for TV…” Since then, several other media outlets have spun this in very wrong directions. Frakes did not develop the series, but was considering becoming attached to it. After being told that Brian Singer and William Shatner had pitches turned down by CBS (which has since been revealed to not be true in Singer’s case), Frakes decided to pass at that time, also noting his doubts that CBS would ever allow a television series to run simultaneous with the 3 contracted movies from J.J. Abrams.” said Foster.
“The fact remains that the height of the franchise came in the early to mid 90’s with the movies: The Undiscovered Country (1991), Generations (1994), and First Contact (1996), while the series: The Next Generation (1987-1994, and Deep Space Nine (1993-1999) were both on television. The lesson should be that good writing will always draw audiences like moths to a flame. We can only hope that the next flame is written with a vision and vigor that resembles that of the latest movie, while remaining accessible to the fans on a wider reaching outlet than the ill-fated UPN.”
“The series concept is fully developed, subject to change of course, with a solid 5-7 year series plan, pilot script and a conceptualized finale that intends to define Star Trek for generations, extensive character bios, costume and ship/set designs, and more. This is a drastic departure from the typical 8-10 page treatment of the previously pitched Star Trek series ideas that have not included even a pilot script.” Foster remarked.
While JJ Abrams decided to go with an alternate timeline for his 2009 Star Trek film, Foster’s planned television project is quite different.
“The series is set in the post-Voyager era, and is designed to return Star Trek to its original series roots in big and mighty ways, without disregarding the other series and movies. As Star Trek (2009) was an alternate timeline, it will not conflict with any canon there either (Note: David does accept it as an “alternate canon”, if you will). The co-creators are avid believers in Gene Roddenberry’s ‘positive view of the future’ and intend to bring Star Trek back to its origins while moving forward with the timeline, integrating the best aspects of each of the previous series.” said Foster.
“The series is highly energized with a much younger cast, and uses cutting-edge future technologies with newly envisioned special effects and designs. It includes Klingons, Ferengi, Andorians, Vulcans, Trill, and many more. The Klingons are getting very restless since the Praxis incident forced them to come to the peace tables, and are tired of having to rely on the Federation for support. The Ferengi have discovered a vast new resource that has propelled them towards instant riches and power beyond anything they have previously experienced.”
“While all of the feedback and news has been completely positive and we continue to make great progress and garner support from key individuals, 1947 Entertainment has not yet, officially, pitched this to CBS.” Foster explained.
The project is currently listed as “in development” under the codename S.E.T.I. on David Foster’s 1947 Entertainment website. We’ll have more information on Star Trek‘s possible return to television, if details become available.
[Quote source: TrekWeb]
LynnS
August 26, 2011 at 1:35 am
This would be amazing. Trekkies WANT STAR TREK ON TV!
Khaaan1984
August 26, 2011 at 1:36 am
Please Paramount make this happen. Star Trek belongs in its original form on TV. ENT was cancelled in 2005. It’s been long enough. We want this. Pleeeeeease?
Phil
August 26, 2011 at 2:43 am
It all sounds good as long as it doesn’t overwrite the post Nemesis books. Also please no more Ferengis!!
james
August 26, 2011 at 11:02 pm
I’d like to see a major production of Cawley’s Phase II series. There are a lot of good stories that can still be told involving Kirk and the crew of the Enterprise. They could even turn some of David Macks books into mini-series, or use them as the basis of a season arc.
Picking up after the events of Voyager might be tricky. For me personally, I’d want to see a future at least 80 years after Voyager. I think we’ve spent too much time in the TNG era already. If we’re going to go into the future, give us something new and meaningful, not just more of the same.
Ratpirate
September 8, 2011 at 12:43 am
Please! CBS or Paramont must let people make Star Trek Tv New Series for fans people. I dont care about low rating and dont give us cancel again! I believe Star Trek fan people is over millions watch this tv. PLEASE LET US HAVE GREAT WATCH STAR TREK NEW TV Series…
Snakecharmerofborg
May 8, 2012 at 9:34 pm
This rumor has been about for a while and as much as I would like another Star Trek series, I doubt it will happen. Mainly because Paramount thinks that JJ Abrams ‘vision’ of Star Trek is the correct one. While it may be popular at the moment with the casual viewer, it is not the Star Trek that most fans adore.
If Gene Roddenberry had seen what Abrams has done to his legacy, it would never had been released. People might kid themselves that it is Star Trek. Just because it has the name, does not make it so. Would people be fooled if they called Star Wars, Doctor Who. As silly as it may sound, that’s exactly what has happened. Star Trek is not Star Wars.